Peter Attia· MD
but also as prophylaxis so you can give a small amount and keep health care workers and first responders on the job because it's preventing them from potentially from getting sick
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but also as prophylaxis so you can give a small amount and keep health care workers and first responders on the job because it's preventing them from potentially from getting sick
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the idea is when you harvest antibodies from individuals who've gotten sick and recovered have antibodies you apheresis their blood you recover the plasma component maybe isolate the antibodies if you give a big dose of that you could potentially treat someone who's sick but a small dose of it like a 5 ml dose you could use that as a form of prophylaxis and the antibody would last a couple of weeks so that a single injection can potentially greatly reduce the likelihood you're going to become infected as a health care provider or a first responder for a period of two weeks