The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the good news is there are companies and technologies that are looking at these things is this belongs into a sub heading of things called liquid biopsies where you could do a blood test and in theory you could find that needle in a haystack you could find that cancer cell that you know you could say well wow this is a colon cell and it has an acquired mutation and that mutation is giving it the capability to escape the colon and take up residence somewhere else
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.