The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
actually it's not as experimental as people think and that this technology has been around for decades plural and that the only thing that's new is that this is the first time the final step has been made which is actually taking a you know a virus that is of concern to humans sequencing it and then you know putting it into a clinical practice
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
actually it's not as experimental as people think and that this technology has been around for decades plural um and that the only thing that's new is that this is the first time the final step has been made which is actually taking a you know a virus that is of concern to humans sequencing it and then you know putting it into a clinical practice