Peter Attia· MD
because you'd think like why would they care if you used performance-enhancing drugs five years ago but in theory they do care because you may still confer a benefit 5 years later even if you've actually been drug-free
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because you'd think like why would they care if you used performance-enhancing drugs five years ago but in theory they do care because you may still confer a benefit 5 years later even if you've actually been drug-free
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.