The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are some studies that show sometimes if you take biopsies from a bunch of different sites and you sequence them you don't even have the same mutations in different sites and one study shows that if you sequence this part of the body different parts of the tumor yeah the tumor has spread to let's say the lung and the liver if you looked at the liver you might give drug a if you look at the lung you might give drug b
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.