The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the interesting thing about leukemia is it was very likely one of the first things we studied in part because we can access it so frequently and so readily and we can actually track its volume in an era where the doctors had to measure marbles through foam rubber with their calipers and so that's why leukemia has always sort of been a couple steps ahead of everything else about liquid biopsies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.