We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the claim was a friend of my friend's father was in hospice with Stage four pancreatic cancer had weeks to live and they put them you know the family snuck in CBD oil for him and two weeks later he was home and cured and you know the problem with those types of stories is not only that they're almost assuredly incorrect it's that they sort of damage the credibility of a body of research because you start to have absurd claims that are thrown in with sort of legitimate claims
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the claim was a friend of my friend's father was in hospice with Stage four pancreatic cancer had weeks to live and they put them you know the family snuck in CBD oil for him and two weeks later he was home and cured and you know the problem with those types of stories is not only that they're almost assuredly
I do sort of bristle against the notion that there are people with stage 4 cancer that are being sold a bill of goods that says you know take your metastatic pancreatic cancer and in two weeks you're cured with this III I'm waiting to see the first documented case of that and I'll continue to be an incredible skeptic of that sort of logic