The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
No, no, it doesn't streamline it at all. It just flies through it like it knocks out phase one, knocks out phase two, knocks out phase three market. So you can say we get to phase two to phase three, it's still going to take a decade. Oh totally. But at the end of that decade we have super drugs hitting the market all at the same time as opposed to incremental process. The increments are all handled up front by the AI and that last decade is just like we just got to do this.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.