The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Nearly all of the drugs that people take are inhibitors of something as opposed to activators. We have some activators in medicine, but not that many. So if you think about cancer and its genetic assembly, then and now. We don't know how to restore the function of something that's lost, particularly if it's wildly genetically disabled to the point of even missing from the DNA of a tumor cell in some cases. We don't know how to replace that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.