The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that was fda approved in 2000 and now these people are being cured with one drug and this is a fantastic success but peter the same drug doesn't work when the disease starts to accelerate so chronic myeloid leukemia think of the word chronic hair it's not really a malignancy it's like a pre-leukemia right now you caught it early that at that stage there was only one problem and you could fix it with one bullet right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.