The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and oral dosing although it's that's not as great in terms of bioavailability it's obviously easy way to get a drug over and across into the system but yeah you're right i think and there's no hip hop there's no there's no liver toxicity with i know you're going to have a bad first pass effect which is why you prefer to put it under your tongue as opposed to to swallow it — but there's no toxicity it just means you need a higher dose if you're going to take it orally presumably
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.