The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a lot of people when they look at a paper let's say it's a bar graph you know um and they see these error bars and they will say people often think oh if the error bars overlap it's not a significant difference but if the error bars don't overlap meaning there's enough separation then that's a real and meaningful difference and that's not always the case it depends a lot on the form of the experiment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.