The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A specific situation if someone said I've got a an antibody or something all you really have to do is give it to them once and it will flip their immune system forever into a good configuration please give my drug has to be given by injection but only one time we could consider that we might need a separate once only sham group also but I think that's the only exception to the rule that we would think seriously about
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.