We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i don't think cocaine can do that so therefore it it has two strikes it's o for two in the peter framework it's it has a physical risk that is non-trivial and it's not going to make your life better when you're not taking it and therefore i think cocaine makes no sense to take
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it has a physical risk that is non-trivial and it's not going to make your life better when you're not taking it