The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we now are going back to say okay well let's give it to females at a much lower dose maybe that'll work or let's give it to females but stop when they're middle-aged so it won't ever reach the really high toxic concentrations
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it turns out that the blood con concentration in female mice is three times higher than in males and as they get older and older and older it the the blood concentration in the old females is 10 times the concentration of young males and it's probably toxic