We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
um you start at age 25 and it's uh your PSA is 0.5 think about this you may it may begin to rise and it goes between let's say now you're 50 so 20 years later it goes between 0.5 to 1 to two to four that's four years where your PSA is doubling which tells you you got a really bad problem before it's even anywhere near being on the radar of the patient or their internist
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.