The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
meaning you can just keep taking it you know for chronic pain conditions you're in you're out even if you have to keep titrating up and it was a a core belief at the company Richard Sackler felt very strongly about this that there was no you know what was what he described as no cealing effect with oxycoton that in fact um you could just keep taking greater and greater doses which you would need to as your system accompanies itself to it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
suddenly there's this medical innovation which you're told uh is like a panacea it can relieve that pain and has virtually no side effects and people can take it forever and there's no dosage ceiling