The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we grew cells in interlukin 2 we found that in fact they could destroy tissue cultured cancer cells have some impact on normal cultured cells as well just by virtue of exposure to interlukin 2 and we call them lack cells lymphokine activated killer cells
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we found that in fact they could destroy tissue cultured cancer cells have some impact on normal cultured cells as well just by virtue of exposure to interleukin 2 and we call them black cells lymphocline activated killer cells