The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i have a much simpler framework for drugs which is um it's really only got two levers one is what is the physical risk of this drug to me as an individual so with cocaine what is the true risk of cardiac toxicity what is the risk of deepening physiologic dependence over time etc and then the second component to my framework is is this a drug that only alters your state or does it have the potential to alter a trait i'm borrowing that from the book called altered traits
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.