Paul Saladino· MD
if you look at Loma Linda in California which he considers to be a blue zone analyses of sperm motility and hyperactivity are abysmal in vegans and vegetarians
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at Loma Linda in California which he considers to be a blue zone analyses of sperm motility and hyperactivity are abysmal in vegans and vegetarians
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
again it's a low numbers in those other people 26 and five respectively for vegetarian and vegans there's a lot of potential hypothesis here is a deficiency of cartine which is necessary for sperm hyperactivation
this study showed that vegetables based food intake decreased sperm quality in particular a reduction in sperm quality male Factor patients would be clinically significant would require review furthermore inadequate sperm hyperactivation and vegans suggested compromised membrane calcium selective channels