Peter Attia· MD
influenza virus for example mutate so much from one year to the next the natural infection or immunization from the previous year doesn't affect you hence the need for a yearly vaccine
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
influenza virus for example mutate so much from one year to the next the natural infection or immunization from the previous year doesn't affect you hence the need for a yearly vaccine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
influenza which has so much genetic drift that every year you have to get a new vaccine if you want to have any chance of being vaccinated