The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
some um I'm not against bounding broad jumps I typically want to start here two on two so twole leave two leg land for this person but they can they don't have to be forward they can be lateral jumps they can be combinations they can be all kinds of things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you honestly you be a surprise like I don't want to say this too loud in case somebody hears but that stuff's actually kind of fun like it's it's pretty fun you're gonna get a lot of Giggles you're like I haven't jumped like this you like like they gonna feel weird and it's gonna be way different than what they're thinking the SL train thing is like you'll get some giggles