The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
i think you'd actually have to look at nitrogen utilization and you know look at look at that kind of stuff to determine like does your body need this protein or are you wasting it until we have objective evidence because you know otherwise it's just conjecture to say i don't think we can actually just pick a number out of the air
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so essentially the signal to noise ratio is pretty low and ultimately what like countless experts have now agreed upon is that the protein for the RDA has been underestimated because of those reasons