The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the problem then becomes essentially one of energetics that if you are trying to run human biochemistry on amino acids exclusively you can do it up to a point but you cannot get all of the calories that humans need from that because the conversion of amino acids to glucose requires atp inputs and the conversion of the ammonia produced from the breakdown of amino acids requires atp inputs to do the urea cycle
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the urea cycle requires atp inputs atp is adenosine triphosphate in order to run the urea cycle we use four units of atp