The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I know of no evidence for harm even in people with chronic kidney disease or anything else. I think there's lots and lots of evidence for benefit in at least um medium-term observable phenomena like body weight, like appetite control, like um bone um strength, muscle and so on for people to be consuming more.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I know no evidence of harm in any group other than perhaps again the very rarest folks and even in people with chronic kidney disease or anything else. I think there's lots and lots of evidence for benefit in at least um medium-term observable phenomena like body weight like appetite control like um bone um strength muscle and so on for people to be consuming more
and I think it's especially true in people who are recovering from injury bodybuilding, uh, looking for performance in athletics, looking for strength, uh, who are older, um, who are growing, all of those things.