The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is hard to get to that you know really high numbers which becomes problematic when you're gonna cut down for bodybuilding shows or when you have to do a photo shoot and keep your amino acid intake higher so that you don't go into a catabolic or at least minimize the catabolic aspects of being on a caloric deficit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.