Paul Saladino· MD
i'm not convinced that in that amount of meat i'm gonna get enough of the nutrients that i need it seems to work out much better when i expand it to about twice that amount
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i'm not convinced that in that amount of meat i'm gonna get enough of the nutrients that i need it seems to work out much better when i expand it to about twice that amount
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i'm 170 pounds right so if you do you know you split that in half or even a little more than half i'm maybe what 75 kilograms and then if you take point seven of that i'm only supposed to by that metric i would only be eating 50 or 60 grams of protein a day that's quite a small amount of muscle meat and organs for me as a 170 pound male 70 grams of protein would be less than a pound of meat per day