The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you could possibly do because those are two different questions right it's like when people talk about how much protein do i need well you only need about 50 grams a day if we're talking about preventing you from being in a negative nitrogen balance but what's optimal for health or lean body mass so that's a very different question right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's like when people talk about how much protein do i need well you only need about 50 grams a day if we're talking about preventing you from being in a negative nitrogen balance but what's optimal for health or lean body mass so that's a very different question