The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I would argue that we should look for micronutrients first fat second and then protein again keeping in mind that we don't want to dip too low on protein but there's a sweet spot for protein with regard to the upper end of limit for protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that most people you can let me know if you agree with this most people would do well to start by thinking about how much protein they're getting in a day yeah this is just like high level you know we're not talking about micronutrients yet but we can we're just talking macronutrients protein fat carbohydrates I think most people if there were more focus on people getting quote adequate amounts of protein I think a lot of people would feel better and I think this is the way to start