Peter Attia· MD
yeah \u00a0we did we did a satiety \u00a0check in that \u00a0really just a \u00a0uh \u00a0using an analog scale we just asked them to rate how they felt and stuff
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yeah \u00a0we did we did a satiety \u00a0check in that \u00a0really just a \u00a0uh \u00a0using an analog scale we just asked them to rate how they felt and stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the protein people were never talking about food and snacks but the people on the high carb diet were always talking about being hungry and snacking and so yeah there's definitely a different satiety and compliance issue to it