Peter Attia· MD
because that's typically what we do why do we always measure a four to six hours that's all the all the labs doing this kind of work is because that's the time between two meals so that makes sense
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because that's typically what we do why do we always measure a four to six hours that's all the all the labs doing this kind of work is because that's the time between two meals so that makes sense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now previously like I said uh most of our studies people like to work on office hours so you have two hours of a runin period uh maybe an hour of an intervention and then four to six hours of postprandial so after a meal measuring of muscle protein synthesis so those are long days so most of the studies so far show that 20 grams of protein does not do better than 40 grams of protein to stimulate protein synthesis for up to 4 to six hours