Rhonda Patrick· PhD
and then the second one was by patina mittendorfer's group in in humans and they were the two key studies that were in The Proposal like Kevin and Stewart had put together – and got funding for with aquaculture
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then the second one was by patina mittendorfer's group in in humans and they were the two key studies that were in The Proposal like Kevin and Stewart had put together – and got funding for with aquaculture
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.