The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's even this old thing called rabbit starvation which you know you can find papers going back on this at least 100 years and they talk about hunters and survival IST and so on out in the woods who can shoot a lot of rabbits and eat their fill of rabbits and yet starve to death because they don't have enough fat and carbohydrate to properly digest
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's even this old thing called rabbit starvation which you know you can find papers going back on this at least 100 years and they talk about hunters and survivalists and so on out in the woods who can shoot a lot of rabbits and eat their fill of rabbits and yet starve to death because they don't have enough fat and carbohydrate to prop ly digest but if you say now can you let's go back and find the trials that showed this