The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
my good friend Valter Longo at USC says we dramatic matically overeat protein we don't need as much protein as we need I test my patients for igf-1 every three to six months there's pretty interesting evidence that the lower our igf-1 goes the longer and better we're going to live
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So there have been studies linking protein and meat consumption to cancer incidence. And there was a really well-done study published last year by Valter Longo's lab at UCLA. And he has been doing a lot of research in this area. He's a very good scientist. He does studies on humans that are correlative, so epidemiological studies, but he backs them up with mouse data and then goes into like cultured cells and he teases apart all the mechanisms.