The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
an animal a freshly killed animal it's a tremendous source of glycogen so a liver a fresh liver is going to have 400 grams of glycogen that'd be fairly small animal about our size not the gigantic Mammoth right and then the skeletal muscle glycogen is going to be over twice that when you're consuming fresh meat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.