The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I would argue that the absolute risk of death is so much lower in that group that the absolute difference in mortality between the younger and the older in the presence of high protein is no comparison what I mean is higher protein across the board is going to save more lives than it would ever hurt in younger people even if you could convince yourself that higher protein intake was associated with increased mortality
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.