Peter Attia· MD
so the suggestion that you can't get a greater response with more protein is biased it's biased because you don't measure long enough
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so the suggestion that you can't get a greater response with more protein is biased it's biased because you don't measure long enough
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, I think, it's fair to say that our lab has contributed to maybe some of the overstatement of the importance of protein for muscle mass. And I'll, you know, throw my hands up and say, okay, some early studies that we did, particularly where we were measuring rates of muscle protein synthesis, we saw these enormous changes with protein.