The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in their model the uh the the relative risk um crossed somewhere you know in the 60s right in other words you know your your total mortality benefit uh was lower eating a high protein diet i think it was starting somewhere in the 60s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so mine was closer to like 50. yeah um that that's that's the point where uh once you get past 50 they're the benefit of a high protein diet on mortality seems to outweigh any detriment that you would get from