Peter Attia· MD
a lot of the studies that were done to determine this RDA were flawed. um they were called nitrogen balance studies for many reasons they're flawed.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
a lot of the studies that were done to determine this RDA were flawed. um they were called nitrogen balance studies for many reasons they're flawed.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Why the protein RDA is too low
It's time to rethink the protein RDA, which is too low and was based on methods subject to incomplete collection and underestimation of amino acid losses.
but um I think the the bottom line here is that the RDA is too low and there's a lot of scientific consensus in in terms of um you know people that are experts in that field that are saying no we need to we need to boost that up