Peter Attia· MD
it obviously seems to be dependent on two things the technique used to basically create the formulation and the clinical judgment and when in you know who patient selection basically for lack of a better word
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it obviously seems to be dependent on two things the technique used to basically create the formulation and the clinical judgment and when in you know who patient selection basically for lack of a better word
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think patient selection is a big is a big concern and as it is in hair loss and many other you know worlds of medicine