The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the two papers presented before me were back to back really well done large numbers over a thousand patients double-blind randomized studies comparing for tennis elbow okay tennis elbow lateral epicondylitis comparing cortisone PRP and um placebo and the placebo and the PRP were the same and the cortisone was much more effective
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.