The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you don't consider mdma psychedelic i mean i don't think i'm an expert to say but no i don't consider mdma a psychedelic personally uh i sort of put it in the category of venom pathogen and um because you don't really have any dissociation with it right you know it's not it's not altering perception in the way that lsd or psilocybin uh would
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.