The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Happily, the answer is that we have no indication that happened. In the 51 volunteers we treated, and the 29 that were treated at NYU, we have no indication that people were harmed by these experiences, but that was a concern initially and it led us to want to give a somewhat lower dose, and that dose, as it turns out, worked just fine.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.