The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
some of the conditions that are associated ated with denovo mutations or new mutations uh we see the frequency of that being greater for parents for instance who are older parents at the time of conception than for parents who are younger at the time of conception and it's not you know that it's like astronomically exponentially higher it's a linear process for those uh those types of mutations
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.