Paul Saladino· MD
So, this salt was clean. It didn't have any microplastics or any heavy metals, but I'm going to call it It is number five out of seven. because it has those anti-caking agents and other additives.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, this salt was clean. It didn't have any microplastics or any heavy metals, but I'm going to call it It is number five out of seven. because it has those anti-caking agents and other additives.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.