Peter Attia· MD
clearly the hormone issues are first and foremost
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
clearly the hormone issues are first and foremost
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think why that happens I think it's maybe just because that they don't engage in exercise as much as this exercise so you know detectable earlier and when you combine that with the fact that there's anabolic resistance potential anabolic resistance to training in and of itself that may explain why you you can detect these bigger effects of strength or gains in strength compared to mass in in those populations
active old older adults probably don't experience as much anabolic resistance as inactive people and therefore it might not be such an issue for people that are Physically Active