The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then the important thing I think when we look at it is that actually it helped the people in the omega-3 group recover their muscle earlier than the people in the control group
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we loaded young women up in either a control or the Omega-3s for four weeks and then we subjected them to a single leg immobilization so basically one leg was put in a brace and then after two weeks that we allowed them just to you know go and recover do what they normally did and what we really found was it was very surprising to us um you know it was seemed like the Omega-3s were completely protective at least from a mass point of view and and they took the edge off the decline in muscle size as measured by MRI
and you know there was that protection and then the important thing I think when we look at it is that actually it helped the people in the omega-3 group recover their muscle earlier than the people in the control group