The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
right exactly and the second caveat which I'll tell them is is you know you may start having symptoms in six months even doing those other things and if you do come back don't don't ignore them if you start having symptoms when you've been asymptomatic something has changed anatomically physiologically or something let's reassess it's not a you know it's not a know it's a dynamic State over a long period of time and so you know you need to be flexible on that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.