Peter Attia· MD
They are not as lethal as being incredibly weak, incredibly low in muscle mass, and incredibly low in fitness.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
They are not as lethal as being incredibly weak, incredibly low in muscle mass, and incredibly low in fitness.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And so far above anything else. Um meaning like when you look at hazard ratios associated with smoking, type 2 diabetes, even cancer um they are not as lethal as being incredibly weak, incredibly low in muscle mass and incredibly low in fitness.