The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but it's mostly for rehab okay because it's the you know when you put a cast down as a position you're well aware of the fact that you're gonna atrophy in six weeks I mean your muscle will be you know 1/3 1/2 this size less than it was but you can use VFR training on that limb or even on the other limbs and it won't answer feet it's just I mean you take the cast off it's the same size
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what we're talking about here is for elite level athletes or for people who are injured or for people who are aging and have age-related sarcopenia which is sort of this loss of muscle mass that many people have as they age something like this could be very useful